What Options for NATO? Dutch Force Projection and Defense Capabilities

Ryan C. Hendrickson

doi:10.1080/01495930802679769

What Options for NATO? Dutch Force Projection and Defense Capabilities

Ryan C. Hendrickson

Eastern Illinois University

Producción científica › revisión exhaustiva

Idioma original	American English
Publicación	Comparative Strategy
Volumen	28
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1080/01495930802679769
Estado	Published - feb 18 2009

Disciplines

Growth and Development
Political Science
Public Administration

Acceder al documento

10.1080/01495930802679769Licencia: Unspecified

Otros archivos y enlaces

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01495930802679769?src=recsys

Citar esto

@article{e9aca8dbf1ba4affade8139ba19c6d14,

title = "What Options for NATO? Dutch Force Projection and Defense Capabilities",

author = "Hendrickson, \{Ryan C.\}",

note = "1. On the history of debates within NATO, see Lawrence S. Kaplan, NATO Divided, NATO United: The Evolution of an Alliance (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004). 2. Andrew A. Michta, The Limits of the Alliance: The United States, NATO, and the EU in North and Central Europe (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006, p.",

year = "2009",

month = feb,

day = "18",

doi = "10.1080/01495930802679769",

language = "American English",

volume = "28",

journal = "Comparative Strategy",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Options for NATO? Dutch Force Projection and Defense Capabilities

AU - Hendrickson, Ryan C.

N1 - 1. On the history of debates within NATO, see Lawrence S. Kaplan, NATO Divided, NATO United: The Evolution of an Alliance (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004). 2. Andrew A. Michta, The Limits of the Alliance: The United States, NATO, and the EU in North and Central Europe (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006, p.

PY - 2009/2/18

Y1 - 2009/2/18

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01495930802679769?src=recsys

U2 - 10.1080/01495930802679769

DO - 10.1080/01495930802679769

M3 - Article

VL - 28

JO - Comparative Strategy

JF - Comparative Strategy

ER -