A mixed-methods evaluation using effectiveness perception surveys, social network analysis, and county-level health statistics: A pilot study of eight rural Indiana community health coalitions.

Jennifer Ken-Opurum; Krystal Lynch; Donna Vandergraff; Douglas K. Miller; Dennis A. Savaiano

doi:10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2019.101709

A mixed-methods evaluation using effectiveness perception surveys, social network analysis, and county-level health statistics: A pilot study of eight rural Indiana community health coalitions.

Jennifer Ken-Opurum, Krystal Lynch, Donna Vandergraff, Douglas K. Miller, Dennis A. Savaiano

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Evaluation and Program Planning
Volume	77
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2019.101709
State	Published - Sep 5 2019
Externally published	Yes

Disciplines

Environmental Health
Psychology

Access to Document

10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2019.101709License: Unspecified

Cite this

A mixed-methods evaluation using effectiveness perception surveys, social network analysis, and county-level health statistics: A pilot study of eight rural Indiana community health coalitions. / Ken-Opurum, Jennifer; Lynch, Krystal; Vandergraff, Donna et al.
In: Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 77, 05.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

@article{5af88849aff74461b8df51a8f4a035f4,

title = "A mixed-methods evaluation using effectiveness perception surveys, social network analysis, and county-level health statistics: A pilot study of eight rural Indiana community health coalitions.",

author = "Jennifer Ken-Opurum and Krystal Lynch and Donna Vandergraff and Miller, {Douglas K.} and Savaiano, {Dennis A.}",

note = "Downloadable (with restrictions)! Community health coalitions (CHCs) are a promising approach for addressing disparities in rural health statistics. However, their effectiveness has been variable, and evaluation methods have been insufficient and inconsistent. Thus, we propose a mixed-methods evaluation framework and discuss pilot study findings. CHCs in our pilot study partnered with Purdue Extension.",

year = "2019",

month = sep,

day = "5",

doi = "10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2019.101709",

language = "American English",

volume = "77",

journal = "Evaluation and Program Planning",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A mixed-methods evaluation using effectiveness perception surveys, social network analysis, and county-level health statistics: A pilot study of eight rural Indiana community health coalitions.

AU - Ken-Opurum, Jennifer

AU - Lynch, Krystal

AU - Vandergraff, Donna

AU - Miller, Douglas K.

AU - Savaiano, Dennis A.

N1 - Downloadable (with restrictions)! Community health coalitions (CHCs) are a promising approach for addressing disparities in rural health statistics. However, their effectiveness has been variable, and evaluation methods have been insufficient and inconsistent. Thus, we propose a mixed-methods evaluation framework and discuss pilot study findings. CHCs in our pilot study partnered with Purdue Extension.

PY - 2019/9/5

Y1 - 2019/9/5

UR - https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v77y2019ics0149718919300266.html

U2 - 10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2019.101709

DO - 10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2019.101709

M3 - Article

VL - 77

JO - Evaluation and Program Planning

JF - Evaluation and Program Planning

ER -

A mixed-methods evaluation using effectiveness perception surveys, social network analysis, and county-level health statistics: A pilot study of eight rural Indiana community health coalitions.

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this